|
|
AAAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AAA AAAA AAAA
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
AAA AAA
AAA AAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA AAA
AAAA AAAA
Quoted for truth and good art ^^
Keep on rollin'
Join Lost Planet 2 Old School Team! We host weekly LPC and LP2 events on PC!
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/lp2ost
Join the Lost Planet Discord Fans of each game and platform are welcome to join!
https://discord.gg/w2tuAdQ
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I guess I should vote now that there's a poll. A
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, Option "A", with an indicator in the lobby that the host has the ability to ban. After some thought I think kicking in game just serves to escalate an annoying situation. Let the cheater play one game and then give the host the ability to select them in the post game chart, and ban them from all subsequent matches. It's clean, and you dont have to play with anyone you dont want to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no matter what systems put into place people are going to abuse the system because the systems going to have loopholes that can be abused. if its majority rule (to boot) its going to both disrupt everyones game, and the majority will almost always be the group of people that continously play together. now instead of having one person thats annoying everyone we have groups of people that will always have majority vote within a game to annoy everyone. as i stated before (within a earlier post) the host boot system isnt anonymous and because of that we know whos doing the booting, if the system was majority rule then we dont know who the majority is (whos friends with who, what groups play together the most) and this will be abused alot more.
|
|
|
|
|
A I like the Halo system, if a person is team killing repeatedly it asks a victim whether they would like to kick the person or not.
|
|
|
|
|
no matter what systems put into place people are going to abuse the system because the systems going to have loopholes that can be abused. if its majority rule (to boot) its going to both disrupt everyones game, and the majority will almost always be the group of people that continously play together. now instead of having one person thats annoying everyone we have groups of people that will always have majority vote within a game to annoy everyone.
as i stated before (within a earlier post) the host boot system isnt anonymous and because of that we know whos doing the booting, if the system was majority rule then we dont know who the majority is (whos friends with who, what groups play together the most) and this will be abused alot more.
If that was the case either way would have to same solution,
Don't Join Their Game. You don't have to join a corrupt host's/Group's game just host your own, or join some one else's.
 Have a question? Send me a Message! Gamertag - xBiBx FrOsTy
Youtube - Jsrfsongwizard
AIM: Defcon97@gmail.com
Lunethex is muh best frand! :)I mod the Lost Planet forums. Cuz' they coo', and I like the Mod Crest
|
|
|
|
|
no matter what systems put into place people are going to abuse the system because the systems going to have loopholes that can be abused. if its majority rule (to boot) its going to both disrupt everyones game, and the majority will almost always be the group of people that continously play together. now instead of having one person thats annoying everyone we have groups of people that will always have majority vote within a game to annoy everyone.
as i stated before (within a earlier post) the host boot system isnt anonymous and because of that we know whos doing the booting, if the system was majority rule then we dont know who the majority is (whos friends with who, what groups play together the most) and this will be abused alot more.
That's true. Isn't it more likely to run into one a-hole than a whole group though? I found this the case with me at least. If we wanted to really get into this idea of the most balanced ban/kick system, maybe a compromise? A system where there's a group vote to kick, but host counts as multiple votes (i dunno say 2?) and only host may initiate a ban/kick, which then allows all other party members to make their choice. If anyone has their own opinions/ideas to contribute feel free.
|
|
|
|
|
no matter what systems put into place people are going to abuse the system because the systems going to have loopholes that can be abused. if its majority rule (to boot) its going to both disrupt everyones game, and the majority will almost always be the group of people that continously play together. now instead of having one person thats annoying everyone we have groups of people that will always have majority vote within a game to annoy everyone.
as i stated before (within a earlier post) the host boot system isnt anonymous and because of that we know whos doing the booting, if the system was majority rule then we dont know who the majority is (whos friends with who, what groups play together the most) and this will be abused alot more.
That's true. Isn't it more likely to run into one a-hole than a whole group though? I found this the case with me at least.
If we wanted to really get into this idea of the most balanced ban/kick system, maybe a compromise? A system where there's a group vote to kick, but host counts as multiple votes (i dunno say 2?) and only host may initiate a ban/kick, which then allows all other party members to make their choice. If anyone has their own opinions/ideas to contribute feel free.
Yeah, the compramise thing kinda works as well, feels like im becoming ignorant 0_0
Have a question? Send me a Message!Gamertag - xBiBx FrOsTy
Youtube - Jsrfsongwizard
AIM: Defcon97@gmail.com
Lunethex is muh best frand! :)I mod the Lost Planet forums. Cuz' they coo', and I like the Mod Crest
|
|
|
