|
|
1) they got rid of the lobby system and did not make playlist matchmaking 2) the leaderboard goes by you ratio of win/loss or kill ratio. you can easly cheat and get to the top of the leader board with a win ratio of 100% be number one and then never play again and stay there. if the leaderboard for post grab places u by you win ratio why not let people party up. in order to move up on the leadeboard you need to win and rase your win ratio, and it is pretty hard to win when you get thrown into a team of a bunch of people that dont have mic and dont know what they are doing. 3) only post grab, elimination, and team elimination. what happen to all the other modes. they are not good enough for ranked. 4) you can not play any of the 2 dlc maps in ranked because there is alway someone that does not have that map in the room. come on, for real 5) no short rang ranked. y? handgun standard or rifle. y those 3 only yeah i know u can play player match...but there is no stat tracking, no balanced teams, and not that many people playing. faction match is a good idea but just let people party up, and dont let the match start with 3v9. only reason to play ranked is to find players faster and get your stats tracked. lp:ec and lp:c mp was some of the funnest stuff to play, now in lp2 not so much.
|
|
|
|
|
1) they got rid of the lobby system and did not make playlist matchmaking
2) the leaderboard goes by you ratio of win/loss or kill ratio. you can easly cheat and get to the top of the leader board with a win ratio of 100% be number one and then never play again and stay there. if the leaderboard for post grab places u by you win ratio why not let people party up. in order to move up on the leadeboard you need to win and rase your win ratio, and it is pretty hard to win when you get thrown into a team of a bunch of people that dont have mic and dont know what they are doing.
3) only post grab, elimination, and team elimination. what happen to all the other modes. they are not good enough for ranked.
4) you can not play any of the 2 dlc maps in ranked because there is alway someone that does not have that map in the room. come on, for real
yeah i know u can play player match...but there is no stat tracking, no balanced teams, and not that many people playing.
faction match is a good idea but just let people party up, and dont let the match start with 3v9.
only reason to play ranked is to find players faster and get your stats tracked.
lp:ec and lp:c mp was some of the funnest stuff to play, now in lp2 not so much.
1. I think playlist matchmaking might be pretty nice, but not for ranked. In ranked you should either be ready to play anything, or specifically look for one game type. 2. If someone can actually go undefeated over 21 games to get on the leaderboard, then maybe the deserve the spot. 3. Sure the match types are limited in ranked, but that is because those are least unbalancing in terms of scoring. The match types that were picked will have the least complaints about annoying win issues and so on. For the basis of win/loss alone it is up to 16 players all getting only either win or loss. Not 1 person wins and 15 lose. 4. Yeah, the dlc maps were pretty stupid. There shouldn't have been anything that could seperate the player base like that. As it is, dlc maps are specifically for player matches and pretty much only among friends. It's really difficult to set up any public game with the dlc maps which is why they were the worst idea for a pre-order bonus.
|
|
|
|
|
1) they got rid of the lobby system and did not make playlist matchmaking
2) the leaderboard goes by you ratio of win/loss or kill ratio. you can easly cheat and get to the top of the leader board with a win ratio of 100% be number one and then never play again and stay there. if the leaderboard for post grab places u by you win ratio why not let people party up. in order to move up on the leadeboard you need to win and rase your win ratio, and it is pretty hard to win when you get thrown into a team of a bunch of people that dont have mic and dont know what they are doing.
3) only post grab, elimination, and team elimination. what happen to all the other modes. they are not good enough for ranked.
4) you can not play any of the 2 dlc maps in ranked because there is alway someone that does not have that map in the room. come on, for real
yeah i know u can play player match...but there is no stat tracking, no balanced teams, and not that many people playing.
faction match is a good idea but just let people party up, and dont let the match start with 3v9.
only reason to play ranked is to find players faster and get your stats tracked.
lp:ec and lp:c mp was some of the funnest stuff to play, now in lp2 not so much.
I completely agree about the messed up leaderboards. Why did they have to over-complicate things? Also, no party system to move with your friends from match to match totally sucks. Its stuff like this that makes LP2 actually look dated and get lower reviews compared to games like Red Dead Redemption that is packed with online features that makes everyone happy. Having said that - I love the Lost Planet universe - so these things don't bother me too much. I'm disappointed no doubt, but I have to admit I am having way more fun with LP2 than I ever did with LP1 & Colonies.
|
|
|
|
|
2. If someone can actually go undefeated over 21 games to get on the leaderboard, then maybe the deserve the spot. u can still quit matches before you loose. sure you dnf goes up and you are penalized for a bit but it is not that hard to do. just go pack into player match till you can get rid of it, then go back to ranked. 3. Sure the match types are limited in ranked, but that is because those are least unbalancing in terms of scoring. The match types that were picked will have the least complaints about annoying win issues and so on. For the basis of win/loss alone it is up to 16 players all getting only either win or loss. Not 1 person wins and 15 lose. point snatcher is the most unbalanced and unpopular game ever that made it in.
|
|
|
|
|
2. If someone can actually go undefeated over 21 games to get on the leaderboard, then maybe the deserve the spot.
u can still quit matches before you loose. sure you dnf goes up and you are penalized for a bit but it is not that hard to do. just go pack into player match till you can get rid of it, then go back to ranked.
3. Sure the match types are limited in ranked, but that is because those are least unbalancing in terms of scoring. The match types that were picked will have the least complaints about annoying win issues and so on. For the basis of win/loss alone it is up to 16 players all getting only either win or loss. Not 1 person wins and 15 lose.
point snatcher is the most unbalanced and unpopular game ever that made it in.
Yeah, it bites to get shot just before match end. Ever thought you might just keep from getting shot, or let some enemy hold the points and shoot them. With support items like the v-device, and the massive weapons that we have, you should be able to work out how to kill these people before the match ends.
|
|
|
|
|
Rubbish? we cant say crap its not a bad word.
|
|
|
|
|
I can keep playing in the same server, actually find a match, and earn XP at the same time in player match. That alone makes it MUCH better than LP1 in my opinion. I was tired of looking for a new server after every match. I think DLC and Faction Matches are the only things which requires fixes. DLC is kinda useless at the moment since you'll rarely see those maps, and faction matches rarely start at all with a good matchup.
|
|
|
|
|
And that is why I said those DLC maps was a dumb idea.
|
|
|
|
|
LP2 multiplayer has been destroyed. The LP and LPC game making system and leaderboards were so much better. But the biggest crime is that there is no Akrid Hunter mode. Thanks Capcom KILL BIG kill your fanbase. Its almost like the guys that made it had to many idea's. I know one thing they didn't even play colonies lately because if they did Counter Grab and Akrid Hunter would have been included in the abomonation they call LP2 ranked multiplayer.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like LP2 ranked matches are designed to avoid cheating or boosting. There were so many complains about leaderboards in LP and LPC. It didn`t requier skills to get on the top but time and friends to boost. New system isn`t worst. It`s different than you (we) used to. Kill ratio is a prove of skills, just like playing every kind of weapon and map, not only one you`re good at. Counting with kill ratio is not the best option for me too cause i didn`t care so much about dying in LPC. But now leaderboards mean something. Earlier it didn`t mean anything. I think we sholud expect our beloved matches type in Lost Planet 2 Colonies . LOL
|
|
|
